RELIGION and SCIENCE
have always been considered to be twin sisters by Islam and today at a time when
science has taken great strides, they still continue to be associated. Furthermore,
certain scientific data are used for a better understanding of the Qur’anic text.
In a century where, for many, scientific truth has dealt a deathblow to religious
belief, it is precisely the discoveries of science that, in an objective examination
of the Islamic Revelation, have highlighted the supernatural character of various
aspects of the Revelation.
After a study which lasted ten years, the famous
French physician Maurice Bucaille addressed the French Academy of Medicine in
1976 and expressed the complete agreement of the Qur'aan and established findings
of modern science. He presented his study on the existence in the Qur'aan of certain
statements concerning physiology and reproduction. His reason for doing that was
that
"our knowledge of these disciplines is such,
that it is impossible to explain how a text produced at the time of the Qur'aan
could have contained ideas that have only been discovered in modern times".
Decades later a noted embryologist Keith L. Moore
and expert in his field, upon being presented with the statements made in the
Qur'aan regarding the stages of the formation of the embryo from the mixing of
the male and female gametes up to the embryo’s full development remarked
"It has been a pleasure for me to help clarify
statements in the Qur'aan about Human Development. It is clear to me that these
statements must have come to Muhammad from God or Allaah because almost all of
this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later."
Professor Moore presented his findings to scientists
at several conferences. Several Canadian periodicals published many of Moore’s
statements and in addition he presented three television programmes in which he
highlighted the compatibility of modern science with what has been revealed in
the Qur'aan 1400 years ago. Consequently, he was asked: "Does this mean that you
believe that the Qur'aan is the word of God?" to which he replied "I find no difficulty
in accepting this."
In fact Professor Moore was so amazed at the accuracy
of the descriptions and the terminology used for the various stages of the development
of the embryo that he modified his own textbook on the subject. He incorporated
all the relevant Qur’anic passages and authentic statements of the Prophet Muhammad
into his book, The Developing Human: Clinically oriented embryology with Islamic
additions, which was published by WB Saunders in 1987 and was a standard university
textbook in the United States. The book now contains passages of the Qur'aan and
the Hadeeth (verified statements of the Prophet Muhammad) for every stage of development
and Professor Moore has also adopted the classification used in the above two
sources.
Consider also the statement of Tejatet Tejasen (Professor
at the Dept. of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mei University, Thailand)
after his study on the Qur'aan passages dealing with embryology:
"From my studies and what I have learnt at
this conference I believe that everything that has been recorded in the Qur'aan
1400 years ago must be true. That can be proved the scientific way".
Also the statement of E. Marshal Johnson (Professor
and Chairman, Dept. of Anatomy, Daniel Bough Institute, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, USA) when he became aware of such statements in the Qur'aan and
investigated them:
"The Qur'aan describes not only the development
of external form but emphasises also the internal stages - the stages inside the
embryo of its creation and development, emphasising major events recognised by
contemporary science... If I was to transpose myself into that era, knowing what
I do today and describing things, I could not describe the things that were described...
I see no evidence to refute the concept that this individual Muhammad had to be
developing this information from some place... so I see nothing in conflict with
the concept that divine intervention was involved..."
Upon being presented with hadeeths (verified
statements of the Prophet Muhammad) concerning dominant and recessive characteristics
Joe Leigh Simpson (Professor of Obstretics and Gynaecology, Northwestern University
Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA) said:
"... these Hadeeths could not have been obtained
on the basis of the scientific knowledge that was available at the time of the’writer’...
It follows that not only is there no conflict between genetics and religion (Islam)
but in fact religion (Islam) may guide science by adding revelation to some of
the traditional scientific approaches... There exist statements in the Qur'aan
shown centuries later to be valid which support knowledge in the Qur'aan having
been derived from God".
Consider also the statement of T.V.N. Persaud
(Professor and Head, Dept. of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University
of Manitoba, Canada):
"Muhammad was a very ordinary man, he couldn’t
read, didn’t know how to write, in fact he was an illiterate... were talking about
1400 years ago, you have some illiterate person making profound statements that
are amazingly accurate, of a scientific nature... I personally can’t see how this
could be mere chance, there are too many accuracies and like Dr. Moore I have
no difficulty in my mind reconciling that this is a divine inspiration or revelation
which lead him to these statements".
These are just a number of quotes from the "Scientific
Community" regarding the nature and the origins of the Qur'aan. In fact the
Qur'aan and Hadeeth do not just talk about embryology but hundreds of other phenomenon
including the earth and sun being round, spinning around their own axis and following
their own orbits, the origin and formation of the universe, the two types of seas
between which is a barrier, the role of mountains in stabilising the earth's crust,
the formation of milk in cows, the cause of sexual diseases, the location of pain
receptors within the body, the expansion of the universe, the precise nature of
the water cycle, the change in atmospheric pressure at high altitudes, the gender
of the bee which is responsible for producing honey (female), the stars consuming
themselves via the combustion of their gases and this being the source of their
light and many more.
Explaining all these statements by chance alone is
something which has been resorted to, surprisingly by those deemed to be possessors
of intellect and erudition. However, this is not tenable, as the following demonstration
will show. When you make a guess regarding the true nature of something (in an
accurate and precise manner that is) there are only two possibilities. Either
you are right or wrong. If you make another guess then you only have one chance
in four of being correct both times. If you make a third guess then you have one
chance in eight of being correct all three times and so on. The chances of correctly
describing, lets say, ten phenomena are 1 in 1024. Another point to bear in mind
is that the greater the number of things you describe, the chance of being wrong
is greater and thus the risk you are taking of being discredited gets bigger and
bigger.
The Qur'aan and the Sunnah (Authentic sayings of
the Prophet (sas)) make statements on literally hundreds of phenomenon and at
the same time openly calls the scientific community to verify them. If one from
the scientific community was to make hundreds of new claims regarding his particular
field and was then to call all his fellow specialists to prove him wrong he would
know without doubt that he is standing on an undermined sand cliff which is ready
to crumble with him. How then for the one who makes statements about the specialities
of others?
One will be surprised to learn that such a scientific
approach has been commanded in the Qur'aan with the objective of ascertaining
its truthfulness.
Do they not carefully consider (investigate)
the Qur'aan or are there locks upon their hearts.
(Surah Muhammad 47:24)
Do they not carefully analyse the Quran. If it had been from other
than Allaah then surely they would have found many discrepancies therein
(Surah An-Nisa' 4:82)
So religious (that is Islamic) beliefs
are not based upon blind acceptance as many have generalised to all religions
and thus falsely attributed to the Qur'aan and Islam. This has been the experience
of Europe in the past 3-400 years in which scientific advancement and its findings
were seen as heretical, its proponents ridiculed and often exiled and tortured.
Islam has never had that experience. It is
true that people's academic capabilities differ and thus some will be unable to
ascertain the truth of it and therefore may accept it blindly. But again they
have the opportunity to ask the people of knowledge, those who are in a position
to make such a judgement, like those quoted above. It is from the principles of
wisdom and justice that when you don’t know you don’t make a judgement yourself
but rather consult one who is in a position to do so. In fact, this is something
Allaah has also commanded:
So ask the People of Knowledge if you do not know
(Surah Al-Anbiya
21:7)
and He has also said
And those who have been given Knowledge know that that which has
been revealed to you from your Lord is the Truth
(Surah Saba 34:6)
This is a clear proof of the lack
of the dependence upon dogma, superstition and personal experience and an indication
of the obligation to research, ascertain and to verify in a scientific manner
the credibility of religious (Islamic) belief. Fortunately there are those who
have done exactly that like Keith Moore and his scientific colleagues but there
are others who have invented lies and slanders in order to discredit the Qur'aan
and the Prophet. However when these lies and slanders are put to the test scientifically
they fail miserably and their irrationality and bias becomes evident. Some of
the common claims are that Muhammad was possessed or was an eloquent poet or was
a magician or was one who was brainwashed or was a soothsayer. In fact all of
these have been denied and rebutted in the Qur'aan itself in numerous places and
numerous times. It is even more strange that these were the very same claims made
by the people who belied the Prophet during his lifetime, and they are the only
ones that are resorted to today. What a great advancement!
Nay! We hurl the Truth against falsehood and it does smash it’s
brains and thus it perishes. And woe be to you for what you describe (with your
tongues)
(Surah Al-Anbiya
21:18)
Amjad Rafiq The
Islamic Society University of Essex November 1994. Note:
All quotes have been taken from a video in which
after having been presented with the statements in the Qur'aan and Hadeeth and
given the chance to investigate, the various scientists were questioned
as to their opinion regarding the Qur'aan. Their response was recorded live. The
video is called "The Truth" and is available from most Islamic Bookshops.
|